You may not use the SDK if you do not accept the License Agreement.Ģ.2 By clicking to accept and/or using this SDK, you hereby agree to the terms of the License Agreement.Ģ.3 You may not use the SDK and may not accept the License Agreement if you are a person barred from receiving the SDK under the laws of the United States or other countries, including the country in which you are resident or from which you use the SDK.Ģ.4 If you are agreeing to be bound by the License Agreement on behalf of your employer or other entity, you represent and warrant that you have full legal authority to bind your employer or such entity to the License Agreement. The License Agreement forms a legally binding contract between you and Google in relation to your use of the SDK.ġ.2 "Android" means the Android software stack for devices, as made available under the Android Open Source Project, which is located at the following URL:, as updated from time to time.ġ.3 A "compatible implementation" means any Android device that (i) complies with the Android Compatibility Definition document, which can be found at the Android compatibility website () and which may be updated from time to time and (ii) successfully passes the Android Compatibility Test Suite (CTS).ġ.4 "Google" means Google LLC, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA, and operating under the laws of the USA with principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.Ģ.1 In order to use the SDK, you must first agree to the License Agreement. This is not because Apple is doing a good security job, but because the NSA is hoarding all the good bugs for themselves.This is the Android Software Development Kit License Agreementġ.1 The Android Software Development Kit (referred to in the License Agreement as the "SDK" and specifically including the Android system files, packaged APIs, and Google APIs add-ons) is licensed to you subject to the terms of the License Agreement. Jailbreak bugs aren't as scarce as boot ROM bugs, but they've been getting scarcer over time. We've had a grand total of two bugs that can be used to install alternative operating systems on an iPhone. And letting Apple dictate the conduct of their competitors is effectively giving them antitrust immunity. So no, "build your own phone and app store" is not enough. In other words, you don't get to opt-out of forms of competition you don't like. Copyright allows you monopoly control over your work, but you are not allowed to use that control to maintain an illegal monopoly that's outside of the copyright bargain. In copyright law, there's a concept of copyright misuse, which is what the courts call using copyright to break antitrust law. If Epic had decided to release a jailbreak to install the Epic Games Store, instead of releasing a hotfix for third-party in-app billing and suing for antitrust, Tim Sweeney would have been thrown in jail for violating. It's legal to jailbreak your phone to install non-App-Store apps, but illegal to provide the jailbreak tool necessary to install those apps. This same logic applies to application software. You can circumvent that by taking advantage of security vulnerabilities in the boot ROM, and that's legal, too, but you can't legally tell anyone about those vulnerabilities because telling people how to break copy protection is a felony. It is legal to run Android on an iPhone, except the hardware boot ROM is designed to reject anything not signed by Apple, and Apple won't sign Android. For example, I can't legally run iOS on my Pixel 8 Pro. A thicket of copyright laws forbid you from unbundling any combination of these. Apple decided where the boundary of competition lies by deciding to bundle their phone, their operating system, their app store, and their code signing policies into a package deal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |